GenAI and quantum computing feel like they’re pulling us out of an era when computers were reliable. You put in inputs and get consistent, predictable outputs. Now? Not so much.
Both tease us with incredible potential but come with a similar problems: they’re unreliable and hard to scale.
Quantum computing works on probabilities, not certainties. Instead of a clear “yes” or “no,” it gives you a “probably yes” or “probably no.”
Generative AI predicts based on patterns in its training data, which is why it can sometimes be wildly wrong or confidently make things up.
We’ve already opened Pandora’s box with GenAI and are needing to learn to live with the complexities that come with its unreliability (for now at least).
Quantum Computing? Who knows when a significant breakthrough may come.
Either way it feels like we’re potentially entering an era where computers are less about certainty and more about possibility.
Both technologies challenge our trust in what a computer can do, forcing us to consider how we use them and what we expect from them.
So, is “computer says maybe” the future we’re heading towards? What do you think?
Is “computer says maybe” the new “computer says no?”
Leave a reply