Faster horses, not trains

I’ve been trying to work out why successive advances in GenAI models don’t feel particularly different to me, even as others react with genuine excitement. I use these tools constantly and have done since ChatGPT4 was released nearly 3 years ago. I couldn’t imagine a world without them. In that sense, they already feel as […]

AI Is still making code worse: A new CMU study confirms

In early 2025 I wrote about GitClear’s analysis of the impact of GenAI on code quality, based on 2024 data, which showed a significant degradation in code quality and maintainability. I recently came across a new study from Carnegie Mellon, “Does AI-Assisted Coding Deliver? A Difference-in-Differences Study of Cursor’s Impact on Software Projects” that looks […]

Findings from DX’s 2025 report: AI won’t save you from your engineering culture

The DX AI-assisted engineering: Q4 (2025) impact report offers one of the most substantial empirical views yet of how AI coding assistants are affecting software development, and largely corroborates the key findings from the 2025 DORA State of AI-assisted Software Development Report: quality outcomes vary dramatically based on existing engineering practices, and both the biggest […]

After the AI boom: what might we be left with?

Some argue that even if the current AI boom leads to an overbuild, it might not be a bad thing – just as the dotcom bubble left behind the internet infrastructure that powered later decades of growth. It’s a tempting comparison, but the parallels only go so far. The dotcom era’s overbuild created durable, open […]

DORA 2025 AI assisted dev report: Some Benefit, Most Don’t

The recent DORA 2025 State of AI-Assisted Software Development report suggests that, today, only a small minority of the industry are likely to benefit from AI-assisted coding – and more importantly, avoid doing themselves harm. The report groups teams into seven clusters to show how AI-assisted coding is shaping delivery. Only two – 6 (“Pragmatic […]